Critical Thinking analysis of Evan's work:
This is a very good critical thinking about the end of confinement in France. We can observe he used every intelligent standard as follow:
- Clarity: good explanation of the context and he explained every assumption
- Relevant: every assumptions or point of view was relevant in the topic
- Precise/Accuracy: he used dates and very precise data (number of victims)
- Depth/Breadth: he explained in deep two points of view with all arguments and tried to give us keywords to understand the topic and the goals of each one
- Logic and fairness: He explained well logic consequences of each possibility and how to make it fair
Grade : 10/10
This is a really good critical thinking video. It talks about the end of the confinement in France he used all the key element that we need in a critical thinking video:
Clarity: he was clear in what he said, everything is explained in a simple way to make it easy to understand.
Relevant: no off-topic, all the comments were on the subject of his video, the end of the confinement.
Precise and accuracy: he talked about the number of victims and gives dates and data, which I think , we can check on the web.
Depth/Breadth: all his proposals were clear and gave the reasons why such an event/thing was said. He gave two points of view of the situation and what could be their outcome
Logic and fairness : He explains well the logical consequences that this deconfinement could have, but also the consequences of not deconfining.
Clarity: he was clear in what he said, everything is explained in a simple way to make it easy to understand.
Relevant: no off-topic, all the comments were on the subject of his video, the end of the confinement.
Precise and accuracy: he talked about the number of victims and gives dates and data, which I think , we can check on the web.
Depth/Breadth: all his proposals were clear and gave the reasons why such an event/thing was said. He gave two points of view of the situation and what could be their outcome
Logic and fairness : He explains well the logical consequences that this deconfinement could have, but also the consequences of not deconfining.